Happy Caturday, Gerbil Nation!
Good morning, Fatwa!
I’ve been enjoying watching the Lefty heads explode the last couple of days. They’ve gone completely off the rails.
I’ll take a look at that Cato article a little later. For now it’s time to get the house cleaned for the crowds that are coming over, tomorrow (with a memorial service sandwiched in between cleaning tasks).
I’m looking t the Mueller report in this simple fashion. There were two parts to it: collusion/conspiracy by the Trump campaign with the Russians during the 2016 election and then obstructing the investigation into the same. Each part is weighed at 50%. There’s no argument that the Trump campaign had nothing to do with whatever the Russians did. Obstruction is at best a 50-50 split. So the report favors Trump 75% to 25%. That’s a substantial margin in favor of Trump.
I haven’t read the report. I wonder if they discuss what the Obama administration, those guys that were in power in 2016, did about all this terrible Russian spying.
Hi Sven!
I’ve heard some legal pundits (who are actually lawyers, not just pundits) talk about the two volumes of the Mueller report. What it seems to come down to is this: volume I is written in proper legal fashion, with legal citations backing up the decision not to prosecute; volume II is someone’s term paper.
Happy Caturday, GN!
Yet another excellent thread GIF, Mac.
Hope very much that you can get that sorted-out and win all the subsequent rounds.
Yup. That’s too many of our “heroic sheepdogs” these days.
Long but interesting essay from Cato -- “From Courtesy, to Discretion… to Heightened Police Power”:
https://www.cato-unbound.org/2019/04/08/sarah-seo/courtesy-discretion-heightened-police-power?fbclid=IwAR1mlG_n2NV6f_5GHuJmsC7fNqW0QkapJ1oeYtPk9P2oxX4A4azGj1sAv0o
Off to MamaK’s for a visit; BBL.
Happy Caturday, Gerbil Nation!
Good morning, Fatwa!
I’ve been enjoying watching the Lefty heads explode the last couple of days. They’ve gone completely off the rails.
I’ll take a look at that Cato article a little later. For now it’s time to get the house cleaned for the crowds that are coming over, tomorrow (with a memorial service sandwiched in between cleaning tasks).
Agreed, Paddy. I just hope that in 2020 we aren’t all scratching our heads wondering how Trump could have lost to these idiots.
I’m looking t the Mueller report in this simple fashion. There were two parts to it: collusion/conspiracy by the Trump campaign with the Russians during the 2016 election and then obstructing the investigation into the same. Each part is weighed at 50%. There’s no argument that the Trump campaign had nothing to do with whatever the Russians did. Obstruction is at best a 50-50 split. So the report favors Trump 75% to 25%. That’s a substantial margin in favor of Trump.
I haven’t read the report. I wonder if they discuss what the Obama administration, those guys that were in power in 2016, did about all this terrible Russian spying.
Hi Sven!
I’ve heard some legal pundits (who are actually lawyers, not just pundits) talk about the two volumes of the Mueller report. What it seems to come down to is this: volume I is written in proper legal fashion, with legal citations backing up the decision not to prosecute; volume II is someone’s term paper.
And yet we’ll be hearing this crap for the next two years -- 2020 is really the time to choose which America and which future we want as country.